Whether the Court of Appeals' disposition on the notice of appeal issue should be vacated

No question identified. : . QUESTIONS i lL. Since the U.S, District Court has Subsequently Confirmed that, the Not/ce . oF Appeal in question was, im fact, timely Filed, Should the Court of Appeals Fourth Cireult's DISPOSITION on the notice of appeal issue be Vacated ?° 2% Should a pre se appeHant be not) fied by district court that , fe appellant's motion , brief , or petition Aas been reclassified fo a notice of appeal 7 . 3 Whether the Court of Appeals Should notity a pro se appellant that thelr motion, brief, or petipion must address the court's expected Subsect matter of a reclass/fied document prior to Filing 4 DISPOSITION ? 4 Does collateral estoppel Classify as an impediment that prevents Filing, /n the Context of § 2244 (d)(Il28) ? 5 When Coflateral estoppel via procedural default cloctrine 1s enforced. cdluring direet appeal /n a criminal Case, Should /? preclude 4 pro se, indigent appellant From Mtg ating an (nekbeetive 0551's tane of Counsel Claim on appellate Counsel ? _ gSurisdictional Statement . " DUNLAP WY MITCHELL Date Filed: M-2-2015 Assigned to; Chief Judge Martin Reidinger Date Terminated. (2-/o-20/5 Case in other Courts. Caldwell County Superior Court Jury Demand: None . 08 Crs 51335 08 Cr5 51353 Nature of Suite 590 Habeas Corpus Hth Circust, /6-06521 (1) \C General) | “th Cireurt, 21-07216 — (T) |Surisd/etion ¢ Federal Question Ut, Circuit, 22-187 In re Barney Adrian Dunlap 4th Circuit, 22-06967 = (T) th Circuit, 22-07396 (1) 4th Circuit, 23~06700 Couse 628: 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state) | Petitioner Barney Adrian Duniap represented by Barney Adrian Ounlap | . # 0864544 v, Columbus Correctional institution . Respondent Inmate Mail/ Parcels David Mifchell 4255 Prison Camp Road Superintendent, Lanesboro correctional Whiteville , NC 28472 Institution PRO SE . STATE PROCEEDINGS . Tune 2 ,2008, tuo Grand Fury Indietments 514-17, Single Count-First degree murder, Sept, 2, 2oll, Fury Found Dunlap guilt, tuo Counts -First degree murder. Sept. 4, 20i, timely Notices of Appeal Filed, July 20, 2012, defendant's brief tiled in N.C. Court of Appeals (wo, Coni2-657] mn x : No reguirecl perfected brief was Filed, , Feb, 5,2013, N.C, COA Filed an unpublished opinion Alo, COAL2-657 in dlireet. appeal, Feb. 7 2014, Pro Se Motion For Appropriate Relief Filed Superior Court f Denied. —. Aug, 14, 2olH, Writ of Certierar’ tiled in NGCOA to review. Super/or Curt order ; Denied Feb, 3, 2015, Pro Se Writ of Cert.,via Art Y Extraordinary Writs, rule 21 review of econ direct appeal, Filed sin N.C. Supreme Court to review No, COAI2-657 / Denied [yo 74 pis] All elatms presented “n 28 U.S.C, 2254 petition were presented to State Courts, . Nov. 2,205, Petition § 2254 Filed in (WONC)( dee, ro, 20/5 Sua Sponte case CLOSED),. Dee.22, 20/5, motion toalter or amend sudgment Filed inlw one) Denied 3-22-2018), April 28, 2016, Motion For Evidentiary Mearing on /netfective assistance of Counsel claim, Denied, Nov, 10,2016, Petition for Rehearing en bane cleemed (out -0Ftime j Peniedl } _ March 30,2021, Writ of Cert, /n U.S, Supreme Court out ~of-time; (April 14,2021; Denied )) Aug, 12, 2021, Fed. R. Cif, rule 60(b)(E) in ( wone) lReelass/fred to Motte of Appeal) ; Sept, (3, 2021, sApY granted, in forma pauper'’s case ao, [21-7216] doc, 23). Sept, (41,2021, informal brief order, Filed in USAPY clecicled Sack of varisdjedion), May /0, 2022, Petition for Rehearing en bane 1 (Denied May 10, 2022) Sees . Aug, (4, 2022, writ of Cert, , Corrected, resubmitted chocke ted { Den/ed review, Lo, April 24,2023, USAPH disinissed appeal, lack of surisdictlon in (22-6967). Lo. April 25, 2023, USAPY AtFirmeel Us0C's Disposition /nl227346), es Jane 28, 2023, USDC cSenied motion to alter er amend vuelgment Denied .. _ . Petltloner snvolks 7+4/s Court's rule (2.4 that allows yeavisdiction 40 review two u'udg ments that ave chsely relatect guestions, Wee. clates of FAC. USAPY Judgments 7 Seeh fo have reviewed are April 24, 2023 Case No. [22-646