No. 23-5981
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts amendment-rights civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law court-of-appeals due-process eleventh-circuit judicial-procedure procedural-dismissal standing
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court err in not granting the petitioner an evidentiary hearing before the record conclusively declined that the petitioner was not entitled to relief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ° DID THE Districy couRT Eff IN Not @RANTING THE PETITIONER, AN EVidENTIATY HEATING LOBERE THE REcoRd did NOT coNclusively dE CHINE THAT THE PETITIONEC WAS NOT ENTiTled qo RElieF 7 ' DID THE CIERK OF GouoRT FoR THE EJEVeNTH CiRwiT Violate THE DEFENdANTS 415° AneNdMeNT RiQhT TO ACCESS oF THE CooRT WHeN ‘Ty | Repeatedly disnissed DEFENMWTS COA ON MER Tess bASIS ? .
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 11, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent