Francisco Rodriquez Ruiz, Jr. v. Jordan Wierenga
Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's civil rights claims against defendants without properly considering the factual allegations contained in the complaint
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED GWA ko UWS, Diseeor o& Aeaoscrighs tre Nonoros\e — Deudaels). boil See <n ones (alte) wrilen Tue ockedl, Cari dd DANA CU “FES BOL (USS COREE Qhoam. Suk ASS mu Meducal Veo sues, and the lack or Krotecdge L have and pad al te shine of me handing omy Ce. Ry w0s Ard On’, Novemioer VY. of JI. Tied Veter Meng Ger He Court | IN Gonci decalaon i oie ~ a) He Cour to Jae ae) AY Ne Sng ZL Fale Yo Resound . Properly on O& Bcvee Wekon Inal Wo Delanhanks Aenea, vier. S Wan Oe VSS ACTMscd. Rod Haled a Kopel bo We US. Cour Hegel Bx WHEN Qomk «Do Yo Wo loa of Koodo dae LZ nad. ok Me Same Fat Yo Fd m4 Reged vadinin 20dass, (oosh-end oF G3 daw) sacclion wis dened | dismesed. W\oD . Aad Snaelag Mo Ses de . crauebe amends Ezine eis, dod 6 957, 264 (9%) 3 N wmMdls are Aad 3 ez OMA aCe KO® ancy weng\” Cater BY Zones "eee ating Cones a can toe weed or forkeded, Unted ast ioe 598 Fad 336 ad bot hal Yomorald 2 SvdHe5 \eat ak Gi SOA OS i Mea Con wo gerrhyar . ENZ Neough 4 Baked eg, Maven anoug pa No) Bo or Yow Yo do Th. (Rroger\y). Dad O81. dred Ye os lee leew ene Consiclemhun, In ho nae ea Ne Vskandeat. We, US2S loro Ssabeiank g ‘rads He Sod ou awn ONY \uSe . Recane wh Goee”R. Stede manks made oFE of Wee ; een te Court (Eastern Disfrict Curd), Decunenied evidence of mail bans mist handled. eub L var not used on my f bd because L ded nek Coss ext He Delpendls Grief. HY OMe OO odiramursed, Ad which 10 hme iL Should jaye been appealed wHhin 36-dags. Ze would hove had a Courcel. Kone of Yoese errors would hae accured. Pon Le a Pidulion One's We UWS Courl of Aegeets oassmurs cal We Clan Rrok WES on We Vaigieay.eg RCRA Untor € Good Foun" Oa Man wos Shot dow. Fodrosch Cul Kocedyce thers Aerncd acliubbed’, Acceghance oF Weug ot allegations wn Congas: wher en) ON A Chofendanks Mokron Lo Assmsgs Sov Seduce Lo Sale @ Otam a avdge mush atcrek AME AT OE Me Cockuch aleaplins conkexned v0 Me compound Ted -Rubes Cw Rcoe, Ge LOWE), 2B US.C% « Leheral Cw Procedure ro Se o¢ i) Rondwaas wk Bocusneal Goh ere G18 do ve Wer Conshrued Ont & eane ComQrarnk Bow w0r wane eaded, ewuss Noe dA do \es wager SeandandS Han Lorwad Aecdwas droC<d So Fed Rules Cw. Proc. Qube S 685; (6), I8US.CA, mA SS aornen —_— ~,’ Supreme Couch oF the Unded Shabes af 24.92 NEN Enacson 1 Perkoner y y, : waces A -Pacdus Oa. fy}; 7, B)) pr Wo. 06-9319 CZ ; abbiply lige meae \ ot). Co 0.2062