No. 23-600

Dan Robert, et al. v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: adverse-effects armed-forces constitutional-rights covid-19-vaccine experimental-injection experimental-medical-treatment judicial-review medical-coercion military-service separation-of-powers vaccine-mandate
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the unlawful implementation of the harmful Covid vaccine mandate in the Armed Services properly evades judicial review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the unlawful implementation of the harmful Covid vaccine mandate in the Armed Services properly evades judicial review based on repeal of the mandate and separation of a service member who is subject to recall to duty. 2. Whether it is proper and authorized for a court of appeals to engage in factfinding, while going outside of the record, to dismiss service members’ appeal without reaching its merits. 3. Whether the government may properly force citizens to receive an experimental genemodifying injection, recognized in the medical literature as causing severe adverse effects.

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Austin, Lloyd, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Austin, Lloyd, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Dan Robert, et al.
Andrew L. Schlafly — Petitioner
Andrew L. Schlafly — Petitioner