Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals erred in holding that the certificate of review requirement pursuant to Colorado's Revised Statute (C.R.S.) § 13-20-602 is not unconstitutional as applied to the Petitioner, an indigent plaintiff unable to afford the cost of expert review — in barring his negligence claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the Colorado Cour! of Appeals erted in holding that the cerlificale of Teview reguirement pursuant To Coloreds Revised Stalite (%.R.5.") & 13-20-602 is not unconslifutional as applied fo the Pelifioner an indigent plainfiff unable fo afford the cost of expert review — in barring his negligence claims. ‘IL. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding or facitly approving that : (A) dismissal for failure fo file a certificate of review should be with prejudice ; (B) expert -— Teslimony is reguited even for conduct Thal the Pelifioner alleged was based on Conspiracy, deceit, and malice; and (C) the Rules of Professional Conduct Cannof eslablish any alfoney standard of care. |