No. 23-6016
Malik Green v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: 28-usc-2253(c) certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interference-with-right-to-testify postconviction-relief prior-criminal-history right-to-testify sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by misadvising him that if he testified at trial, the jury would learn of the details of his prior criminal history — which resulted in defense counsel interfering with the Petitioner’s right to testify. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2024-01-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2023)
2023-08-30
Application (23A195) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 5, 2023.
2023-08-25
Application (23A195) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 3, 2023 to October 5, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Malik Green
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Trisha Meggs Pate — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent