No. 23-6018
Calvin F. Currica v. Richard Miller, Warden
Tags: brady-standard brady-vs-maryland criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit guidelines judicial-review plea-agreement plea-bargaining post-conviction-review sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision below should be summarily reversed because the Fourth Circuit substituted its judgment for an erroneous factual decision by the state post-conviction review court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether the decision below should be summarily reversed because the Fourth Circuit substituted its judgment for an erroneous factual decision by the state post-conviction review court. i
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent Miller, Warden to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2023)
2023-08-14
Application (23A126) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 11, 2023.
2023-08-07
Application (23A126) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 12, 2023 to November 11, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Calvin Currica
Erica Joan Hashimoto — Georgetown University Law Center, Petitioner
Miller, Warden
Jeremy Hugh Welter — Maryland Office of the Attorney General, Respondent