No. 23-6021
Sharon Cammille Riddick v. Boston Housing Authority, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process retaliation rule-12 rule-70 rule-8 rule-9 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6), Rule 8(a)(2), Rule 9 are an adequate basis to dismiss the petitioner's complaint?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
questions presented are (1).Whether Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12 (b) (6) (f), Rule 8 (a) (2), Rule 9 are an Adequate basis Rule to dismiss the Petitioner’s Complaint? ; (2).Whether not enforcing Fed.R.Civ. P. Rule 70 is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause and is suppression & obstruction of justice of the Petitioner’s Court filings ? 2
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent Boston Housing Authority, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Boston Housing Authority, et al.
David Frye — Russo, Frye & Associates, LLP, Respondent
Sharon Cammillle Riddick
Sharon Cammille Riddick — Petitioner