No. 23-6033

Darryl Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights clifford-pinkney darryl-smith due-process james-gwin james-kennar prisoner-rights retaliation sixth-circuit standing us-district-court
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-01-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the total bar of all court access rights violates the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ae 0. AMSTLOF PARTIES. EJ AL PARTIES APPCAR IN THE CAPTION OF THe CASE. ON THe COVER PAGE ANd ARE AS FollowWS5~— oo, U.S, TUDES JAMES GWIN ETAL.) . U.S, DISTRICT. CoURT CND,OHIO)) a —. JAMeS K@NNARD; LISA BOOTH, |. oo, ) . TIM MCCONAHAY, . a . RELATED Cases . , DARRYL SMITH V. CLIFFORD PINKNEY 3 SHERIFF ETAL, oo, Cu,S.DISTRICT COURT 5 N,D, OHIO) CASE NO: 18 CV~ 00103. DARRYL SMITH V, CLIFFORD PINKN@Y 3 SHERIFF ET.AL. oo, ( U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ; SIXTH GiRcuIT) APPEAL NO, 21-3486 IN Res DARRYL SMITH 5 CASE NO. 22-3698... . . : ; CUS, COURT OF APPCALS 5 SIXTH GiRCuUIT) . . IN_RES DARRYL SMITH 5 NO. 23. A-S (us, SuPReme CouRT) Ss er Be OF AUTHORITIES oA BARI OF ALL COURT ACCESS RIGHTS — —PARAYL SOUTH Ve CHEEORD PINK MCY.; DIST. case NO. 18 C= 0163 — —} __ __( 2018 U.S, DIST.LEXIS _I7I1O8 ~ 2022 U.S, DIST. LEXIS 139179 -) a , __€ 2023 U.S, DIST, Lexis ory) CEXHiBiTS; 14,26) 136,137,138) __DARRYL SMITH Ve CLIFFORD PINKNEY; APpeAL NO; 21-3486 (Gt ___ 2.022. U.S. APP, LEXIS 6659 | | | _——_CexniBits; 8,410, 33,34,35,36) I __DARRYL SMITH Vs DOUGLAS. FeupeR.: Dist. e4se Nt, 21 ev=00984 ——__ IML RE; DARRYL SMITH; APPEAL NO, 22~3005 (6H em.) _(2022_U.S, APP, Lexis 29729) Lexmieits; 5,07) _.( 202 U.S, APR Lexis 1504) | _ . | oo — ~ i il — _ Or a TAB LO OF AUTHORITICS — | PRO $@ PLEADING STANDARDS | ~ER0 Se PLEADING STANDARDS | AGE # —~ANDRADE V, GONZALES ; 459 F.3d, 538, aT 543 (2006 __CAVeR Vi STRAUB 5 349 F.3d. 340,347 (o% em, 2003 a i: ; DUTHIL Vs MURPHY; 550 E.3d, 154 AT 158-59 (2906 z — Pheeny. UNiTed STATES; 240 £34.78 (2001) . ho HAINES V.KORNOR 5 4OY U.8,519, 520 (1972) — . ~~ RATUEF VUS.5.999 F.2d. 102.3, 102 ( bt c1.1993)___ : bo — USN. GARTH, 188 F.3d.99, 108 (1999) _ | —— US. Vi TORRES 5 163 F.3d, 909,49 ) _. A TOUR NAL ENTRIOS —STATC OF OHIO _y. Bedford: 84 OHt0 APP. 34,588,592 (2009) | | TT MAM OAMUS FILING REMEDY. —BOZ/K V. BRADSHAUIS 2010 U.S. DIST. LaXIS 14 _ 44 ROSE V WARDEN OF CHILLICOTHE CORR, INST. 5 2018 U.S,DIST. LEXIS 1, near OO RR AMST, i TOTAL BAR OF ALL COURT ACeess a _!S_ PROHIBIT: ae | | ORTMAN V. THOMAS ; 99 F.3d, 807,811 ( GH-e1R, 1996) | Bo : : | PAGE # _MiLieR V. DONALDS SY F.3d. 1091 ( It ein. 2008) L the iimnenT DANGER REQUIREMENT _ _ —ANDREWS V. CERVANTES 5 493 F.3d, 1047 (9% cig a _BRQuIN _V.JOUNSON; 382 £34134, 1350 (4 eiR.2004) ___3. IS, —SHAUIS Vi CHARRIUS; lB F.3d.102 (2d. ciR.200) as, —2TOUNSON V. WARNER > 2006 U.S. APP Lexis 24090 (4% CIR, 2006) — So _LAPINe V.SOHASON: 2018 US. APPLEXISs 20540, (O* cy iy tg 2020-8 bistcenis 17K03 Lome) . . ci ~TuckeR VPONTRICH; 483 Fed. APEX 28 ( Gt @1R.2012) MIS) ——--_euumensTe inbiFFeReNce BY PRISON RR AMD TA PH ELALS 5 ———Fawune. To Protect peisonets Ram} ASSAULTS STABBINGS AND DEATH Bf ~RAmSTOCK Ve Me CRARY 273, 3.083, 99 (lot C18. 2001) —___ ly ___ FARMER NV. BRENNAN; SU U,S.825 (1994) ty TONES V. SHEANAN ; 2003 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 19804 (W.0, ILL, 2003) (Io | 7 ! | _ a | PAGE tH _KLINGeLE V. BiKen Berry ; $49 F.2d. 409, 412-13 (9% OR, 1988 | by _L0f02 Vv, LeMASTOR® 172, F.3d.756,764 (10% 012, 1999) ; | ‘Lb, _PLeRSON_V, HARTLEY ; 39) F.3d.898,903 (7% eR, 2004) he __RiCHKO V. WAYNE COUNTY; 819 6.3d.907 (om CIR. 2010) li TAYLOR Vv. MICHIGAN DepT_OF CoRRecTIONS: 69 F.3d. 70 (6% 1.1995 l p _ __westmoReLAND.V. BUTLER COUNTY; 2022. U.S, APP_LEXIS 2772. (lat Cik, lio ; ewan Bearine prisoners2 i A perawees pRonigiTed +P eens __BRooks v.kKWweRs 204 F.3d. 103.(3d.ciR.2000) lye _. COMBS Ve WILKINSON? ta __DANLEY Vv. ALLEN ; 540 F.3d, 1298, 1308-09 (Ht cip.2008) | 7 Hudson Vv. MeMittanl; 503 U.S.1-8 (1992) Z _ | 0) — -___-sJOMNSON_V, BLAUKAT 5453 F.3d, 08,13 (8% CiR, 2000) bo | _ PARK V.SHIELET; 250 F.4d,843,854 (41 048, 2001) yy SMITH V MENSINGER ; 293 F.3d. 041, 650-(3d.CiR. 2002) | __UjutTed_ STATES Vi, Cores 544 F.3d, 88, 91-99 (2d, c1R.2008 | 2 __VALes ve cRosey; 450 F.3d. 123) Ci c1R.200 } ; | 0 _ __VALeNCIA-V. WiselNis 5 181 6.24. 1440, 1447. LEH c1R.1998 | MATHEWS V. CROSBY 5 480 F.3d,1205,(ll* CR, 2007) _ __wATTs Vv, Me Kinney 5394 F

Docket Entries

2024-01-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
2023-09-08
Application (23A221) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until November 12, 2023.
2023-08-28
Application (23A221) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 13, 2023 to November 12, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Darryl Smith
Darryl Smith — Petitioner
Darryl Smith — Petitioner