No. 23-6034
Alfredo Sanchez Barboza v. Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment contraband exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment inevitable-discovery inventory-search probable-cause standardized-protocol subjective-motivation
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the inevitable discovery doctrine validates the prior illegal seizure of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia when the police officer's motive in an inventory search is to search for contraband
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, upon application of the inevitable discovery doctrine, a hypothetical search pursuant to the inventory search exception to the Fourth Amendment validates the prior illegal seizure of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia when the police officer who would have conducted the hypothetical inventory search testified a motive in any inventory search is to search for contraband.
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Alfredo Barboza
John E. Egers Jr. — Peacock Keller, LLP, Petitioner
John E. Egers Jr. — Peacock Keller, LLP, Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Rachel Wheeler — Washington County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Rachel Wheeler — Washington County District Attorney's Office, Respondent