Can a judge of two appeal courts open a child protective custody case based solely on hearsay accusations prohibited by state law, then set bail/bond conditions intervening in the protective custody case to refuse the family visitation and reunification?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Delore the Court is a matler \nv ol ving unabused ehildren qraSicked inte Coster Care by Pee. hearsay , Causing: “nregaicable harm. The mother sullered expecteck Aistres$ as tesult. The Pefendants have wea Ponited thet alistess to. petro actively sysnty initial femeval | refusal +a Reantly , abstain 2rom protecting. the ahildeen Sutl ering Qoster aguse/ Redleck and Create more elaborate accusations to Terminate a family in ab sence of all jurisdiction Qe which Neher Conn abstention Sanctions Sucl Q deprivation eo haman rights and ow da parka ne of settled State, Federal, and Lnternattonrel Law ; ‘hat it Calls for desperate plea eo! a Morthker to ahis Court's exercise o& | supervisery power. Start to Cimishy slus Case — THESE CHILOREW deserve your Hime, — Theak you. i.) Can a “ yudoe af& Fwo Aprial courts Open a child ; proveckive Custody Case based solely on hearsay accusattonS Prokrbsted by Sate State, then Set ba:!/ bord —Conditions inter ve ni ey in ake protective Custody Cose Yo refuse ake Lemily visitation and teant cation? W Can a edge oninvoalued ine protect? ve Gustody Gace Set bail | bord QCard tions in an amount Wigher Shan a. Aekendant's costitution 7 Qounck atl and include Aa ; — Gontack. With VartacS Ron~ parties sched ina, Delendant S$ own éhildeen ? | 3) Con DebendentS Qreate. Sysiemia barriers to eect tua’ assistance a counsel, aleny a Family opportunity oF Mandated Colloq voy, reviews, anc appeal on iSSues of abuse of procesS). jurisdiction, Gaud w eo whe Court, abuse of discretion, and yubicial misconduct +e Conce, & ertmipation of parental Mans ona amity deprived ot ake Cundamentally Coir optertunity so VXigate, the Locks on Cours record 7 4) Cana state Coure of last resorts declare a Mw Standard of review Of evidence ogoinst a class of people wre PTSO/ depression so “pro pendur ance of eurdence ” thax ake diagnosis ig, inand of iasell, “\eopardy Lo OWildren when the Supreme Cours has demanded a Srate rebrain Grom a Presumption that a alass of people are ontik Parents CStantey uv. Lllineis was OS, 64S @SU-S% €1492)) ond requires “Clear and Cenvineitge eui dance of abuse /nealect (Stanresky Miramar , 4S US. Ne 6-9) (\a82)? $) Can aState Cours of lase fesort deny appeals /atempts of a motler's pedresS of the tral Gourt abuses ) thea. eco xhose a@buseS fo limit and inhibit a Family's Tae +o etReck ive Bours on Lineal a ppea | ondanint, an AN assumgrrion Shade rneeckive Counsel will Somehow Provide Mosler an opportunity ho Taste, Conshi tutional Questions Wher counsel has reused | Caited Cor aver | year? é) Con am nite Srateg Disteree Court abstain | : Whan the Saat. Courk 15 Causing: inrepaira dhe paren. to fundamental hrcren Prghss 2 : 2) Can a United States District Court and for Unpred. Dhates Couce of Appeals objecdively deny Co Counsecd fo @ pekones see Rin. redress ON e& ratte won requires GBEROINImENt ot Caunseh errer +e €) Con ax Onited States Disamret® Court and | or Unitecal States Cour of Appeals vavelte, Prisan Litigatien Raforon er requirements of ce petitions Simply because Ske 1S berry detained IN sh eee . — VD Cone Onied Stateg Distrer Court and for Untied SreeS Coure of Appeals PEI Mew On indi gen . Plant te poy {Mtge Cees under the Prison Liktaedton Reform aie when Sk ts MIT P ensuing GLKON — G.gainse the yaks. oe P) Con a US. Pistesre® Cours pefuse counsel, opportunity te be heard by a Pre $e Watgane then reuse eerily: ate ot appecle bility so Phevent oo Pre se Aolerclant Aan opportunity te Cotree error? . a