No. 23-6039
Selbourne Waite v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 aiding-and-abetting crime-of-violence criminal-law hobbs-act rule-of-lenity sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether aiding and abetting a Hobbs Act robbery falls outside the definition of a 'crime of violence'
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether aiding and abetting a Hobbs Act robbery, which may be completed without the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951(a) and 2, falls outside the definition of a “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. § 92.4(c)(3)(A). ii
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Selbourne Waite
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent