Ernest Bustos v. Encino Park Homeowners Association, et al.
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities
Whether the Court violated Petitioner's protected rights
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Court violated Petitioner’s protected rights preventing the \ appeal to move forward failing to compare and evaluate the conduct of the Respondent’s false representations ignoring that Respondents’ complaint , was frivolous show the custodian of record affidavit was fraudulent. Whether the Court showed bias when dealing with pro se litigant ignoring well establish Supreme Court case law dealing with Pro se litigants violating his constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment Access to courts and Equal Protection Clause and Fifth Amendment Due Process of ; Law. t ii IDENTYITY OF PARTIES Petitioner: Ernest Bustos Pro se \ Petitioner: Ernest Bustos 2163 Encino Loop San Antonio, Texas 78259 Telephone: (210) 313-3787 : erblassoc2@aol.com Respondent: Encino Park Homeowners Association Respondent’s Appellate Counsel: Appellate Counsel: ” Kyle D. Giacco; SBN: 07839150 Email: kgiacco@dawray.com Willie Ben Daw, III . whdaw@dawray.com Suleha F. Shaikh; SBN: 24098411 Email: sshaikh@dawray.com 5718 Westheimer, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77057 (713) 226-3121 Telephone (713) 266-3188 Respondent’s Trial Counsel: Elliott S. Cappuccio . 2161 NW Military Highway, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX 78213. ; . iti