No. 23-6048
Elvis Redzepagic v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law federal-sentencing material-support offense-level sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation terrorism terrorist-organizations
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the correct offense level should be used in sentencing violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339B(a)(1), (d)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether this Court should grant certiorari to resolve the circuit split regarding the correct offense level that is to be used in sentencing violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339B(a)(1), (d) (attempt to provide material support to foreign terrorist §2X1.1 (attempts) or § 2M5.3(a) (completed offense). Whether this Court should grant certiorari to instruct federal courts how to consider properly the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8553(a)(6). il
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Elvis Redzepagic
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent