Does a prisoner serving a 36-month prison term for revocation of supervised release concurrent with his 360-month prison term for a drug conspiracy meet Article III's case-or-controversy requirement when prison officials deny the prisoner release to home confinement under the CARES Act because of the petitioner's violation of supervised release for which his supervised release was revoked?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOES A PRISONER SERVING A 36 MONTH PRISON TERM FOR REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE CONCURRENT WITH HIS 360 MONTH PRISON TERM FOR A DRUG CONSPIRACY MEET ARTICLE III'S CASE OR. CONTROVERSY. REQUIREMENT WHEN PRISON OFFICIALS DENY THE PRISONER RELEASE TO _ HOME CONFINEMENT UNDER THE CARES ACT BECAUSE OF THE PETITIONER'S VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE FOR WHICH HIS SUPERVISED RELEASE | WAS REVOKED? oo oe . DO NUMEROUS VERMONT STATE SUPERIOR COURT NUNG PRO TUNC ORDERS = OF EXPUNGEMENT EXPUNGING PETITIONER'S PRIOR CONVICTIONS USED. 7 TO INCREASE HIS’ 2001-IMPOSED MANDATORY GUIDELINE SENTENCE RENDER PETITIONER ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF HIS 2011 VIOLATION OF : SUPERVISED RELEASE? ~ oh, , | ‘ , ae oo ,