Did the court make a mistake rendering orders on an ex-parte basis?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . Did the court make a mistake rendering orders on an ex-parte basis? Did the ex-parte application render the necessary elements for ex-parte relief? , Did the court act without the required legal elements to an ex-parte and make unilateral decisions of custody in this case? . ‘Did the court violate it’s discretion make mistakes in the law pertaining to jurisdiction, custody, and the Constitution Provisions pertaining to Parental . Rights and State Encroachment to those unalienable rights? Had there been no third party placed on this without consent or stipulation rendering an opinion on education, would there be legal grounds to remove the education power from the Appellant? ; . Is it a violation of the Constitution for the court to arbitrarily hire their attorney ’ at the public cost to protect the state interests in the representation of the school district and obstruct the funding. allotted to the proposed conservatee in the District Courts? , _ Is it a violation of Equal Protection for the District Court to hire an attorney to represent the state interests at the public cost having legal prowess and expertise to manipulate these proceedings against pro se parties? : Is the District Court acting in a Conflict of Interest acting as a Party to this . matter in addition to the court officers also parties on this matter? . Did the court make a mistake in the law by indicating that “advocacy” fora . special needs student was a compelling circumstance to remove rights from a parent? ; Did the court make a mistake in the law by making a rule regarding custody on an exparte basis based on an issue that had not occurred? , Did the court make a mistake in the law by ruling on a family law matter outside of its jurisdiction in violation of Family Law Orders? . Did the court abuse its discretion by ruling on custody when there was no petition made for a change of custody? . . Did the appellate court make a mistake in the law stating Appellant had to 7 compromise the care of the Proposed Conservatee thereby denying FAPE and IDEA? ; : Did the appellate court make a mistake by rendering a Special Education a Opinion in violation of Federal IDEA Law antithesis to the law? , Did the California Court act in Obstruction of the Federal Individuals Disabilities Act (IDEA) Jurisdiction and Protections? : Did the court abuse discretion by discharging all documents and evidencerequested by the court as an order to show cause when the petitioner indicated : 1310d was not appropriate nor the intention of the appellant? Did the court abuse it’s discretion by attempting to force a 1310d inappropriately on the appellant subsequent to her appeal? : ; Did the court abuse it’s discretion by denying mother’s, appellant’s exparte and : petition to the court to move forward on Approved Independant Educational Evaluations per IDEA Federal Procedural Safeguards for proposed Conservatee at the public cost. : : : Did the court make a mistake by ordering parties to file under a code with the oo , intent to circumvent Due Process and the Appeal absolving Los Alamitos School ‘District and Del Sol School of Legal Ramifications under IDEA and ADA: a : matter of appeal? ; C ; 3 Did the court execute a mistake in the law by making an order that would take the Appellant’s full-time employment and medical insurance without cause; , thereby, leaving her destitute to provide for her home and children, and further starve her out of Due Process? . ; , Did the California District Court Collude with the Los Alamitos School to Circumvent Due Process under Federal Procedural Safeguards with Cheryl Walsh, Esq. hired by the court and the Public Defender? : Did the Court Falsify Documents/Records by Adding the Proposed Conservatee’s Name as an Objector on the Opinion? ‘ ‘ Does the falsifying of the Document/Record bias the in the furtherance of Due Process? ’ Does the falsifying of the Document/Record cover up the violation of Due ‘ Process and:Procedure man