Whether the Court of Appeals of the First Circuit's affirming opinion in Zuniga-Bruno's case is conflicting with Pirset Circuit precedents

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED First Question 1. Whether the Court of Appeals of the First Circuit's affirming opinion in Zuniga-Bruno's case is conflicting with Pirset Circuit precedents United States ¥. Lara 970 F.3d 68 74 (lst Cir. 2020), United States V. Garcia Ortiz 657 F.3d 25 (lst Cir. 2015), and Supreme Court precedent Bravo Fernandez V. United States 196 LED2D 242 U.S. (2016)? The answer to this question is YES. : Because the vacator of Zuniga-Bruno's predicate felonies clearly barred issue preclusion on the auxiliar offenses, thus affirming the District Court's degision to NOT re-sentence Zuniga-Bruno on the non vacated Count's of Conviction goes against Prior Supreme Court and First Circuit Court's precedents cited above.