Did the Court of Appeals violate the due process right to present a defense, in holding admissible, under O.C.G.A. § 24-4-403, (Rule403) extrinsic evidence from a prior sexual assault case that was dismissed by a separate trial judge for a Sixth Amendment violation of the Speedy Trial Clause?

question presented is: 1. Did the Court of Appeals violate the due process right to present a defense, in holding admissible, under O.C.G.A. § 24-4-403, (Rule403) extrinsic evidence from a prior sexual assault case that was dismissed by a separate trial judge for a Sixth Amendment violation of the Speedy Trial Clause? i . RELATED CASES : Mulkey v. State of Georgia, No. $23C0581, Georgia Supreme Court denying review judgment entered August 21, 2023. [App. C] Mulkey v. State of Georgia, No. A22A1452, Georgia Court of Appeals affirming Petitioner's conviction, judgement entered January 17, 2023. [App A] State of Georgia v. Mulkey, No. 18CR00183, Douglas County Georgia Superior Court denying Petitioner's Motion for New Trial judgment entered March 1, 2022. [App B] State of Georgia v. Mulkey, No. 2012-SU-CR-1468-DS, Bartow County Georgia Superior Court order granting Petitioner's Plea in Bar on Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial, judgement entered February 18, 2013. [App. E] : ii :