Whether the State of Washington violated the petitioner's constitutional rights, including due process and effective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED MYRWUDLTANG Received Nig Clientele Thad Task OLMOst \a years LO TELANE From ne Slate oF Loashhiogion POE ReNender ARIEL TED MR MioMsG CHeanr Ws Was COMPUEN and Eqregiovs Miscondest ‘ey Tre Stars oF Wasiniagrond “ed des\ed an Violated Prose CRRLSMANS Const uensl, r\ AWS SO Com Uieory PYOceSS, Tre Qiake oF Ldkshina ton Fr por co OF Vied AO “THE Sudge on Prose MAW Mams erofion Torre courts. Nae Sod THE Srake Roos eco sorgakord STHHE WIG Veendlay ce he \ my se © ‘ AM DRE Lo\t ness Qud Vickens avrenty lacenioneriew ed paler “He dso Age YO Aanmy Prose MR VIALAWS Moher ForsS deYense ond, eWree Hive ssighancés eaten TINS esrediors PHiKCondUct By “me Stone oF Lies Wien ton Was “ rare Nay SALE Polaric_dekender wyed We Sete = Vire UTHK ys we aoe weno ecavse Ne Worked ME da WAN? My Speedy m0 | hgh S sey $0 get Wiscuery me, bo Plea Ook THATS S*rESS ANd We Kelig me ae on : pre se arb G0 43 . anann : AViamMs CrNose % 8 VS Lode Wine TAS make TR Wiis n> Adeese For Wig ls mrcape Ao Lee Whe Hd exrdence or Escrety ender awyer Trak Couldge oe 2) Lahn Sete PURE SEE Ake Vo Sst resistance oF Cobnsel boss ok Wishake oF SY Ty Cocovery and Serer Sncdencts TE we cfate VA any 4 dyway. MWe State Dowie deader lawyer ose ne PEL ne Wa ns ~ mRvoi VAM Del re washing ion Gate Supreme Cour TS Ny ress oe nae ; . AN Wer 20 iMate Aiscre Honary, Review Wo 4 MREINSES NS tte Bante nee.” QKnowed AIgcHrrakiod APMOST ease oem, adn Wed LAL THE GS Sxances SNidence +o Wave ” y ne omar knadten ciate Subreme Cours Tesiporse eas woe Lowers coe oN elements OF Newy Uscovered Credence MA ick \een RS POOSE TAR WANG MOOR BORAT AIY THE OUNCE “ntrere -) Dromede NA THe CSU LOE Acia\ Proyably WEEN CH ent |