No. 23-6067

Michael A. Lajeunesse v. Kris Karberg, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-attack constitutional-protection constitutional-rights direct-review due-process gideon-v-wainright habeas-corpus issue-preclusion res-judicata
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

If legal claims preserved by a state court during direct review share the same constitutional protections as the right to an appeal from a final judgment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. IF LEGAL CLAIMS PRESERVED BY A STATE COURT DURING DIRECT REVIEW, SHARE THE SAME CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AS THE RIGHT TO AN APPEAL FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT. GIDEON V. -WAINRIGHT (1963). Il. AND, IF SO, WOULDN’T THAT ALSO EXTEND TO STATE “COLLATERAL ATTACK” AND FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS UNDER . THE DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA (COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL & ISSUE PRECLUSION)? iii.

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Kris Karberg to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)

Attorneys

Kris Karberg
Darrel MullinsIowas Dept. of Justice, Respondent
Darrel MullinsIowas Dept. of Justice, Respondent
Michael Lajeunesse
Michael Alexander LaJeunesse — Petitioner
Michael Alexander Lajeunesse — Petitioner