No. 23-6067
Michael A. Lajeunesse v. Kris Karberg, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-attack constitutional-protection constitutional-rights direct-review due-process gideon-v-wainright habeas-corpus issue-preclusion res-judicata
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
If legal claims preserved by a state court during direct review share the same constitutional protections as the right to an appeal from a final judgment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. IF LEGAL CLAIMS PRESERVED BY A STATE COURT DURING DIRECT REVIEW, SHARE THE SAME CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AS THE RIGHT TO AN APPEAL FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT. GIDEON V. -WAINRIGHT (1963). Il. AND, IF SO, WOULDN’T THAT ALSO EXTEND TO STATE “COLLATERAL ATTACK” AND FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS UNDER . THE DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA (COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL & ISSUE PRECLUSION)? iii.
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Kris Karberg to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Kris Karberg
Darrel Mullins — Iowas Dept. of Justice, Respondent
Darrel Mullins — Iowas Dept. of Justice, Respondent
Michael Lajeunesse
Michael Alexander LaJeunesse — Petitioner
Michael Alexander Lajeunesse — Petitioner