Is not having actual availability of effective counsel and actual presumption of innocence, particularly in cases deriving from previous judicial defect, constitutionally allowable?

No question identified. : . UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS Is Not having actual availability of Effective Counsel and actual Presumption of Innocence, particularly in cases deriving from previous judicial defect thai a court may cover by enforcing its own narrative, Constitutionally allowably in some cases? What latitude of options shall be available, especially for the indigent, per Mandamus, alternate Venues, alternate methods of Jury of Peer selection, etc.? Are government debt contracis that in actual practice, effectively are managed to impose Civil Death, rather than collect, Constitutionally allowably in some cases? Is barring bankruptcy review and discharge for court and government : debts Unconstitutional, particularly “Child Support” were there are No children involved and no interested party will even negotiate to get paid by allowing income, and therefore cover any other outstanding debt like remaining Student Loans? Is county court impugned and enforced effective perpetual Homelessness — Nationwide — sometimes Constitutionally allowable? Third party review? In actual practice, when is an Identity a part of your own persona that you are entitled to use to work and earn a daily sustenance for yourself and basic household needs and then lay up some reserves for incapacity and care in old age — with a manageable social contribution, and when is it government property that you can only use by rent, and only when you can afford the rent in amount and terms of Anything demanded? When is the amount and terms of rent on your own working Identity Not subject to disinterested third party review and action? What is the Federal definition of personal Identity and who owns it? Does it change hands with court. impugned assessments? In this case'I submit the government effectively demands a state of NEO-FEUDALISM -— Ok as Defendant / Serf, I can stipulate to that ~ but how do I get a Court to rule that as only a top Judiciary can — to declare it openly and then DO IT RIGHT as per a thousand years of time tested and refined Common Law? What is the definition of Due Diligence on a Presentencing Report for color of criminal history, particularly differentiating judicial defect from legitimate history? What is the definition of demonstrating Responsibility or Remorse? If Not demonstrating enough Responsibility or Remorse is used as a basis for real extra prison time, then that apparently needs a real definition precluding using as a general excuse to brush off any other factual argument. p. ii