No. 23-6079
Santos David Ramirez-Ortega v. United States
Tags: appellate-review conflict-with-other-courts criminal-procedure district-court guideline-range holguin-hernandez judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines substantial-arguments
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, after Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S.Ct. 762 (2020), a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range, even if the party had not lodged a specific objection to the court’s failure to do so? Whether a district court errs in failing to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range? i
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent