Joe Stephens v. Alaska Division of Elections
Securities
Whether a candidate's right to have their full legal name on the ballot
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 41. Whether this Court will allow the People of the State of Alaska to determine if a certified candidate is allowed the name Joe Trump AKA Not Murkowski Stephens on the ballot for election to The Senate of The United States of America. 2. Whether this Court should determine if subject matter jurisdiction in Federal Court applies to a case where there are clear and obvious violations of the . First Amendment and Fourteenth amendment. 3. Whether despite Mr. Stephens alleging numerous facts sufficient to show the ballot containing his nick name was fair, simple and clear, can still have his case dismissed in federal court. , . . 4. Whether despite Mr. Stephens alleging numerous facts sufficient to show disparate treatment and despite Mr. Stephens alleging numerous facts sufficient to show no rational legitimate governmental purpose existed with the Alaska Division of : Elections’ Ruling to disallow his nickname, can still have his case dismissed in federal court. 5. Whether this Court should determine whether a certified candidate by the State of Alaska for US Senate has a Constitutional right to have his full legal name shown on the ballot for election to the U.S. Senate, regardless if said name communicates a message or messages to the voters. | 6. Whether the Constitutional ri ght of the Legislature of the States to prescribe the “Manner of Holding Elections” can be usurped by the State’s Executive branch by , claiming a candidate is in violation of election rules without providing any proof of violations or allowing due process to the candidate. ;