Did the State of Arizona violate the Due Process Clause when its prosecutor presented knowing use of false evidence to the jury as in Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1?

Question(s) Presented Did the State of Arizona violate the Due Process Clause when its prosecutor presented knowing use of false evidence to the jury as in Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1? Was the 5*" and 14% Amendment violated by the State of Arizona prosecutor, by knowingly consistently and repeatedly misrepresenting DNA evidence as in Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1? The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the Due Process principles of the aaa 14** Amendment can not tolerate a State criminal conviction obtained by the knowing use of false evidence, Dose the same apply to this case as in Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1?