Why is the petitioner being denied relief, when there has been a significant infringement of petitioner's Constitutional Rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Peibionsr has shown the courls a plethora of new evidence to Support numerous Vv lldions of pchitioners Constitutions | Rights, Mok mech he qualifications : — Persvant fo 23°U.S.C.4 € aas4 (a) and 8B WD.C AP 2254 (a) G), Therefore, why 19 the petitioner being denied rch, when there, has been a Saif cant intringemend of pe\itioners | Sonetvtaional Righhs In addiion, \he, pedioner was derived a cer Ke K ce of appea leas ty and We oppeci was dismissed , wy Ye US. Macs tral Sudg, We. Neapsteche Svdoe duns pa\oner ferleA Yo Cle tne Socuments, * Apjerion To The Macistrale | Ss) Lage Recommenda on ina Hmely manner , and stotes She pek\oner meiled the , Obj echion . Documeny So re ron, adds ess, However, tre pab\ioner Fo\Noused meal instruckions Snot wee ser bo pedioner by The Nor > , Carolina Prisoner Leag\ Services, and did meet he deadline of 3 /| [oa. (Document and certSyed recline receash ynchud) ed) TheteSore, aby ‘to The panionet being Wed ad Faull) hen The Tor Cardling Prisoner Leo Services, age sending Omrendes exrormous doen Corpus Aocuments bo Se to Ye courts % Also the courks argue Yat Yne petihion Was fied ovdside ne oneyear Vimihakion period according yg AEDPA, However, the exception is 33 US.c.A, $ aasy (a) as well 05 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, S4 Ce), rat states mokvons may only be ogartted in three sttuctiens! Q) to account for new evidence. nok available ok {Aol or (3) to cotreck a clear error of Jad or prevernk manifest inyustice.s Why 1S Ye. cour system reusing hy obey Mne law SN Ye land and comique ho deny peki _ oner reiek Cor Wis dovious Miscarrade & yest ce.