No. 23-6098

Ricardo Dinnall v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-justice criminal-procedure district-court federal-sentencing first-step-act judicial-discretion sentencing-reduction sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389 (2022), requires district courts to consider all nonfrivolous arguments raised by the patties in adjudicating First Step Act motions

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389 (2022), requires district courts to consider all nonfrivolous arguments raised by the patties in adjudicating First Step Act motions.

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Ricardo Dinnall
Andrew James DeSimone — Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDNC, Petitioner
Andrew James DeSimone — Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDNC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent