No. 23-6102

Rolandis Chatmon v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2023-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-order civil-rights constitutional-deprivation court-procedure due-process federal-rights federalism judicial-power standing state-government takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can Constitutional depravations be justified by some remote administrative benefit to the State such as an Administrative Plan?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Can Constitutional depravations be justified by some remote administrative benefit to the State such as an Administrative Plan? , 2. Can local practice, such as an Administrative Plan pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order #14, be allowed to defeat or put & unreasonable obstacles in the way of a plain and reasonable assertion of Federal rights? 3. Can the power of decision vested in the trial court be delegated to investigators, other subordinate officials, attaches of the court, or anyone not authorized to act on behalf of the judicial branch of the State government? IST OF PARTI ALL PARTIES APPEAR IN THE CAPTION OF THE CASE ON THE COVER PAGE BLE TENT Opinions WV Jurisdiction Vi Constitutional and Statutory Provisions involved -_ Vii -Viii

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2023-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Dexter Payne
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Rolandis Chatmon
Rolandis Larenzo Chatmon — Petitioner
Rolandis Larenzo Chatmon — Petitioner