Whether the federal court erred in imposing an illegal sentence that exceeded the statutory maximum penalty

QUESTION PRESENTED Actus. 92269) sould be Corrected there a —Ln5..Cotart ___ of Appeals Pinds hetodisteick cock ‘incorrect, ” determine d thot to of the thee required predicates did not qualify for —__Sn _ Interested Pacties . _ fesuonk to Sup C42. Mi bdoriin; ZT, Michoel V MRoe submits thod theres _No_gther or partits +s the proceedity other than thase named ia the caphon af foe nL © <5 Relate dd Proceedings The following proceedings dicectly relate tothe case before the Court! —_ __Vnited States V Michcel Veneter Mine, fase Mo. 1ti4-cr-o0ns ($0.64), aff, Ubited! Shtes Ve MoRae case Wo. 2): 13905" Cii"h cir 2003) (unpublished decisionJ a, rr e @ TAR LE OF CONTEWTS “QUESTIONS PRESENTED a oe aoe ae eeoro amon so saab eososa | __TNTERESTED PaQTTES 6 6 wa annoe evr evens Leaves aseaeocoaaill TABLE OF CONTENIS ee ces aceon wsood oor seseo en lit __TA@LE_OF AUTHORITIES wo xcs 2 oot oe seem eseaseoen ee WV . __PeTLIION £OR WRIT GF CeOTrORART » 22 0.00 eee eentes eoeeesooe t __OPINTON BELOW 2 2s o 5 ao no won nosso sa eccosansoay A STATE MENT _OF JM@ISOICTION 2 cco ee % __ STATEMENT OF CASE 2. es e@ ws 2 oo ee ee oo ee Bee eee ee A. Federal Couct’s in general recognize that ijlegal sentences trigger the _.__deparked from this usinel Course by officening om illegal sentence of BS months jin bahich, exceeds the Stohitony maxioun peaclty applicable __ Conthisign eu sa 4 ee aw & oe ee ke eee eee voecevsee coos FT Appendices _Nopendix A Elewenth. Circuit Couct of Appecl s’ Unpublished Opinion — Coe Mo) 3.90. Ut thie A gst $2623