Whether respondent's actions in forcing petitioner to live in an unhealthy environment violate petitioner's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Respondent forcing Retstioner to lve in an unhealthy ——— TNnsg envionment. , YS. Court of hppeats For the Ninth Cavcutt (4th Gr), contradicted itself by first, Ordering the U.S. district Court, Northern District ot Calrfornia CDC) 40 Vacate and —— Revngind rts Dismissal of Petrhoner’s clams, finding, Cause | hy Respondent 5 ack of omissiot\. Second, the 4h Cir Dismissed the Petitioners appeal after a seond denial © bythe DC, ignoring Leawsel. ) : \ !