No. 23-6112
Derek Paul Smyer v. Bryan D. Phillips, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus judicial-discretion ninth-circuit standing third-party-culpability
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it failed or refused to apply the correct legal standard in evaluating the plaintiffs' claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : |. ,
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Bryan D. Phillips to respond filed.
2023-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Bryan D. Phillips
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent