No. 23-6114
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-rights court-opinion due-process evidentiary-issues ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-procedure legal-issue legal-relief procedural-error record-development
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether APPELLATE Counsel's PERFORMANCE WAS deFiciut uNneteR StrickiANnd
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “op Whether APPELLATE Counsel’s PERFORMANCE WAS deFiciut uNneteR StrickiANnd X. Whether the issug oF TusuPeicgat Evid CE WASA Sigs Picadt . ANd obvious ANC ClEARIy) PIAINIY SEROMJER ISSUE thAN those that WERE Presevtid on APPEAL~ 7 >. whether the HAL Record WAS substautially developed Por te . ISSUE OF INSUPRICIEN} ENICENCE Aud the /ssut PREseRved for APPEAL. | rN Whether the CAUSE ~AUD-PREJOUCE testis sAfisPied by APPELLATE (oussel & be Picseutt PERFORM. ANCE « | &. Whether LAM Evtited to REWEP due to APPELLATE counsels Asficnut ParPoRMANces. .
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)