Whether the district court plainly erred by admitting expert testimony about the common characteristics of a particular type of offender, also known as 'profile evidence,' and then allowing the government to argue that Petitioner was guilty because she had the same characteristics and behaviors outlined in the profile?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court plainly erred by admitting expert testimony about the common characteristics of a particular type of offender, also known as “profile evidence,” and then allowing the government to argue that Petitioner was guilty because she had the same characteristics and behaviors outlined in the profile? pretix