No. 23-6123
Kyle Maurice Parks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: camera constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence law-enforcement perjury search-and-seizure suppression-hearing vehicle
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a court allow the prosecution to present evidence of a defendant's vehicle, camera, or perjury for the purpose of a suppression hearing and violate due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CAN A poles othcee plawT evidence 1 A defendants Vehelsc, Canam ir Perjury fo ThE LecT AT Suppression ancl Yosrad ancl mor YlolsTé Due Peocess @ T Keblr€ bL p15 1A loner ds te goveenmnenT Atlowel fo presen? AFIow Ww PSR fo enhance ancl Not Ytola7e dvs Peoce aS
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent