Whether the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari by the highest state supreme court, followed by a denial of a timely appeal by the state district court of appeals, which is alleged to have been procured by fraud on the court in collusion with the lower court judgments, constitutes a miscarriage of justice in violation of the 14th Amendment due process clause

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | : With herein evidenced incompetence that cannot be ascribed to any ° agency view or expertise coupled with Fraud on the Court in collusion | spanning from the Trial Court Judges to the Court of Appeals Judges and , i of the Respondents inclusively as a collective with the intent to have then = Plaintiffto Appellant to Petitioner be caused to exhaust remedy for , recourse. | . Would after having been denied by the highest State Supreme Court j ‘ _. for both Petition for Review and for Petition for Rehearing is then a State | . District Court of Appeals denial memorialized in Unpublished Opinion 7 . of a timely Appeal of the issues presented which is then too denied therein 7 for Petition for Rehearing to stand when evidenced is that said ; Unpublished Opinion is procured by Fraud on the Court and is in . , collusion with and in support of the inferior Trial Court J: udgments which 7 are too inclusively procured by Fraud on the Court with easily apparent : ; and evidenced egregious discord to harmonious Case Precedent | Authorities and Statutes and Codes of Civil Procedure and Rules of Court in violation of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis and of the 14t* Amendment ; Due Process be by this High Court considered a Miscarriage of Justice. i | eee : iii :