Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures

No question identified. : , @ @ i QUESTIONS 1. An employee of the United States Postal Service in a labor-management dispute that arose within a postal facility; under Section 8 of the United States Constitution, you can determine at your will that it be a municipal judicial forum under state law that decides if those acts of employment conduct constitute criminal offenses and not the federal judicial or administrative forums? 2. Does a civil petition for an order that require prior a determination of the configuration of a criminal offense, violate the due process of law guaranteed in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments but omits the facts with which it purports to constitute the offense? ‘The configuration of the criminal offense may be adjudicated without being required to comply with the constitutional standard that provides proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Two criminal evaluations may be carried out in the state jurisdiction on the same facts alleged in the criminal act without this intervening with the Fifth Amendment? May in that act the local court be able to deprive the right to legal possession of weapons granted by the Second Amendment without guaranteeing due process of law for it? 8. Will the action of a state supreme court violate the due process of law and the equal protection of the laws by suspending all its regulations approved to handle the appellate process without rules, in a particular, exclusive and subjective way in a case occurred in a postal facility and reverse the determination of a state appellate court that ruled that a crime was not charged based on the proven facts and thus also ; revoke without the criminal matter being before its jurisdiction the criminal determination of a LOCAL COURT that dismissed criminal charges under those same facts? @ @ iii