No. 23-6131
Eliseo Vaquerano Canas v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-agency administrative-law congressional-directive sentencing-commission sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-authority statutory-interpretation use-of-a-minor use-of-minor-enhancement
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority when, contrary to a Congressional directive, it made the 'Use of a Minor' sentencing enhancement applicable to all defendants regardless of age
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ISSUE PRESENTED I. Whether the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority when, contrary to a Congressional directive, it made the “Use of a Minor” sentencing enhancement applicable to all defendants regardless of age. i
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 12, 2024.
2024-03-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 13, 2024 to April 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2024.
2024-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 12, 2024 to March 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 12, 2024.
2024-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 12, 2024 to February 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-13
Response Requested. (Due January 12, 2024)
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Eliseo Vaquerano Canas
Michael L. Tumposky — Hedges & Tumposky, Petitioner
Michael L. Tumposky — Hedges & Tumposky, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent