No. 23-6135
Charles Kevin Agerton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-approach controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense criminal-law federal-jurisdiction legal-interpretation offense-matching sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an offense-matching categorical approach applies to the determination of a 'controlled substance offense' under the Sentencing Guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether an offense-matching categorical approach applies to the determination of a “controlled substance offense” under the Sentencing Guidelines? ii Parties Involved All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. iii
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Charles Agerton
Megan Jean Saillant — Offc of the Fed. Pub. Def. for NDFL, Petitioner
Megan Jean Saillant — Offc of the Fed. Pub. Def. for NDFL, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent