Whether the Honorable Court in the United States District of Georgia Harta Division Abused Plaintiff's Procedural Due Process Rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : ; i 1 Ub did Wenorable Court in the Unitedl Stakes Nisine+ Foe Ho van ee Drstnct a Gengia Harta Dunsior Aorucd! Plaudrft, pucker for EFP bn Februny 9029A) Jy, did Vovnahe how dea Courr leferminect had Lefrach & wil Aehon VAS +me —lured by a Suite limitation provisin in Applicable insvrance poiuey DD. WUhet diy gen ud lefhach, File a ltun wrth SPE Fron, srnalbjmold, 5h . . 5). did'nt sae. horwrab le lourt inthe United Stakes Disinch For ? sdk toe Penoable Court united Stes of WS Why Oe” so bax. ee ovrnr Trad Court eke 4M eleven Cur 4). Was the honorable Courts 1€55 Stringent, with Planbff Proceeding Pro’se than fovmal pleadings by Lawyers lunges Nery VV. Prowcrfe 03Cu hoa CA DS) Cwow) &-Ds-¥bec %, 200% Cred [> +e: Huges vRowe, 444 5-5, a) Lb L. Gd. ad 163, 10! Sice bo C1980) quoting Haines vu: keener, You US. 3 19) 520 3 30 Lied Ad W5a,9a5-er SU (19728 The tort recognize thet itmust male reasorable allowanCe 30 drat a poise plamhft Aes nok orfert wignts hy ure pe ws [ack of legal training « 4 gy pi Ad Ay pmorable Court? infee LePrwrol's Case erred in ve echng ip Htwteh by Proceed Fn Fea Pm pers) Pit Mohons . 2M and regarding tus Coo” | . .