Did Respondents deny defendant-appellant's due-process rights by failing to provide a three-judge panel on appeal?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In an only appeal of right of a criminal judgment, did Respondents deny defendant-appellant Ronald Boyajian’s (“Petitioner”) Due Process in failing to provide a three-judge panel in deciding the merits? 2. Did Respondents further prejudice Petitioner on his only appeal of right in a de facto life sentence appeal by excluding from the panel an assigned judge whose ; vote is known favorable to as Petitioner? . 3. Does a circuit judge’s automatic recusal from a proceedings triggered by his failure to make arrangements to attend oral argument violate Petitioner’s rights when Respondents knew the judge has elected not to attend hearing but fails to draw a replacement judge to reconstitute the statutory three judge panel?