No. 23-6159
Eddie James King v. Doctor Aikens, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment medical-care search-and-seizure standing
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim is valid
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . | To Ve OPPoSing Turches , Abe PlounbfP 1S Clearly cashing fhe true meaning OF deliberobe tndifCere 2, because Prout bh aM 7a the Trocepets Tan I bein ignore / SErrOUs medi ve Weeds has be Jay ose Where 16 the Jastce 7 | ts oa ath amercl Yrioleten On Py, Ubncih seh? \o Yrescnhe alt Ne cree 0 Sot n Curcady jee OOnS ‘ ore \narm On ~ | | ee vectors bnecu! mv | . ynediest direc: war oq Vee ahead needs enc net, seta al Ceres ay Proper tneclical Vrowder 1: me te ee Ladhion @ 5 ath amend Violaben ”
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Lane Ulrich to respond filed.
2023-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Lane Ulrich
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent