Whether the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina applies to individuals on supervised release

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017)—which recognized a First Amendment right to access the Internet for sex offenders who had completed their sentences—applies to individuals on supervised release.! 2. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), which makes it a federal crime to induce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct, in any case where the depiction was “produced ... using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce,” exceeds Congress’ powers under the Commerce Clause, U.S Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3. 1 A similar question is presented in Finnell v. United States, U.S. No. 23-5835 (pet. filed Oct. 16, 2023). i INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)(i), Mr. Herrera Pastran submits that there are no