No. 23-6169

Juan Carlos Soto v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-USC-3553 appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-sentencing ninth-circuit-court remand sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why does the Yeh Circuit Court of appeals Remand (Wmost Cases Where all of the appeal ant's Non-Frivolous Sentencing arguments are Not addressed by the District Court, but Denies remand in the instant Case?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A . Sel ective Remand Pesipioner asks: Why does the Yeh Circuit Court of appeals Lemand (Womost Cases Wheve Aor all of the appeal ant's Noa~ Feivolous PAT gating ar quments are Nor addressed by the Doestetote Court, bat 2 Aentes remand in the tastant Case. Ts a Disarice Court Tastice \ " Required zo address ale 13 USC. 5 35530) Lactars Or simaty it & “Central Thes's of counsel arguments When imposing & Sentence? B. D,ubte quesioa) ) ubstantially Eycessive Sentence Pestaroner asks: Ts; a Federal Sentence that Is in Posed +40 fun Con secativety With an Und ischarg ed Srate Sentence Sub stantic lly Ry cessive when the total time Served exteeds the PSR Guidonce range} | Does suck Sentence Cangrituse Donble Tesp acdy When Work Sertences Fegulred Brom the Same Course of conduct? ' t -j

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2024)

Attorneys

Juan Carlos Soto
Juan Carlos Soto — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent