No. 23-6179
Anibal Miranda-Montanez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review case-review criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review jury-instructions legal-sufficiency procedural-challenge standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence trial-evidence verdict-challenge
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence was insufficient for the verdict to stand
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether The Evidence Was Insufficient for the Verdict to Stand.
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Anibal Miranda-Montanez
Victor Antonio Ramos-Rodriguez Sr. — Victor A. Ramos-Rodriguez, Petitioner
Victor Antonio Ramos-Rodriguez Sr. — Victor A. Ramos-Rodriguez, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent