No. 23-618
Delano Marco Medina v. Colorado
Tags: burden-of-proof constitutional-law criminal-conviction criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process guilty-plea judicial-procedure judicial-review legal-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-it-is-consistent-with-due-process-to-convict-a-criminal-defendant-without-finding-the-defendant-is-guilty
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether it is consistent with due process for a court to convict a criminal defendant without finding that the defendant is guilty.
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-21
Reply of petitioner Delano M. Medina filed.
2024-03-14
Brief of respondent Colorado in opposition filed.
2024-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2024-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2024.
2024-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2024 to March 14, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-28
Response Requested. (Due January 29, 2024)
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent Colorado to respond filed.
2023-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Cato Institute
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
Colorado
Shannon Wells Stevenson — Colorado Department of Law, Respondent
Shannon Wells Stevenson — Colorado Department of Law, Respondent
Jillian Joy Price — Colorado Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Jillian Joy Price — Colorado Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Delano M. Medina
Stuart Banner — UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Petitioner
Stuart Banner — UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Petitioner