Clifford Allen Follansbee v. Arizona
Securities
Are Arizona judiciaries violating the Due Process Clause of the Arizona and United States Constitutions, by practicing a Professional Norm that is contrary to Arizona law?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 ‘ Are Arizona \udiciaries wicloking the Doe Process Classe. ot the Arizona and United States Conattutions , by practicing o Professional Morn that is contrary to. Arizona \ous? \. le the. Arizona ludiciary, permissively allewsing and parks parking in | | An engoing Professienal Norm designed te deny criminal defendants atairtrial ? "a. Did the. Cecenine Coury, Superter Coum(Trick Coucd\ previeled the ferun ; by which fo admimater “Strockoral Error” ° ; Visthe Asseciation Factor o component o¥ the verdick? DCoald Cucodive \nstruckiens have. remedzed the prez udicial ham seffered ? bDid the Arizona Couck of Appeols provide acentiaval methed +e promete. “Gheuckural Eeroc’? : oo c. Dad the Arizona Supreme Couck proviele the means to promote. “Structural Error? 2. Diel the Prosecukien and. Trial Court continvallly place in geogardy He ' fundamental Frameweck oF Follansbees criminal trick , result: ng in “Sheuckural Exrec’? 3. Should ail errminal defendants fromthe peried of December 1, 200% +5 Aenuary |; 2010 be grarked “Retroactive Shatus’ forte Arizona Sugreme CouckS . Gailucecto provide celiel fam an errec of the con making? . . ii . | | | . |