Whether the U.S. Government violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment by failing to compensate the petitioner for the taking of their property

No question identified. : _., QUESTION D wy wert 198 WEocewe? ens 00 nthe ! OF BELZME PND COMPENSATE vie wer ZESVED AAW OFFER Case P79 Che Ye EM Rede ALICE TOT Oe 1G Cf “YEP = ECP EF wat BAM OFZ Zz x @ fe ee ete CRersal CHOSE poveWr Ae? Lg p irene ° war (3 MZ Cap OF AES £AZLED 728 cannbEy THIER fle a U8, S0fAEME CHE Hb OST AFTEL US. GOVELM EXT Wht 2SED zZ7e Leal, RECHT 7 RESP) — EL US. SUMEME AE Lass PfFEZEER V UNE? STATES e) DECESFeW [0-3 JOSE Ww? Mas! THE PICCEC BEEN COANTED AectsS TA THIS” Y2-17 53 it tribe EPIL RECHT set_ {PCED F-2F2a2a =~ WE MEOWE pesrater Cael OF pba Led nce O2 WLU AFP @ UY HAE ve DES) Di panimé TOF Ju7ZcE. KEPT SLLERT Cu) TES CAE NYS fe CAI ESI “paLbe Bee! FOE oF AOE Gm farsenmtt LY HSE CAEL OTN apa A ATE ME CTD oLAndons oF PTTUEL, Foren Z< FF _ oti ARDE ge Fes EN . izn< wT EELED BF Ler LATED gFe. ozg 14Fe 0020 F560 F277 ~ SEE ATTRHEO Pack oF MAECECCS , Oo OA? Adit poy SEE PEEW RESDEED Fr) THE FLEZNIG OF THES CLEVES CAE LA9-S 00 VE ¥-LILUI-K FE With, WLIEES PAwv€ BEEN PAED FUIECE GEM SDETOPPLED Fo AF 2822 mM, © wr Watt THE 1 We es F Caet OF POAT eerED THE FOE QESTRLET Lo l07 OF Ath hirra yeOr OBSIDIAN BE EDIT Dene Ae. WIE DINE prea FEES TaD P-C2223 78 DEAAID Fee AVEHS Co 2 F THE Joust 07 8 CEH penatr OF THE PETIT IONE Mt DERVLE 18 TH Bed PEELFEL SR. HOTAGE ISP OB-O8R Fo MEGE Fv co Venu THE whawes of CHAFEE FEObh AL TOPE TF excel, veal? C, ranKts.2 WE (ZLLNG FEE shal B26 Bige bine FO pee C cwe. BEZWE FEC WY, OU gunk Chaz’ 2. Z Ee OE 1 eee spt BE THE Bat ok ACKER ES AO bg. Go Cn EY OF O oe ¢Y Me b-L 22