No. 23-6194

Christopher Andrew Canales v. Nathan Hoffman, Acting Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery-rights due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-discovery voluntariness-of-plea
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner should be entitled to full discovery (inculpatory and exculpatory) during the plea bargaining process

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS HAS DECIDED AN ’ IMPORTANT QUESTION OF FEDERAL LAW THAT HAS NOT, BUT SHOULD BE, SETTLED BY THIS COURT, AS TO: (1) WHETHER PETITIONER SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO FULL DISCOVERY (INCULPATORY AND EXCULPATORY) DURING THE PLEA BARGAINING PROCESS THAT MANDATES THAT PETITIONER VOLUNTARILY, KNOWINGLY AND INTELLIGENTLY, WHEN MAKING A DECISION TO PLEAD GUILTY; AND/OR WHETHER PETITIONER’S COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE IN ADVISING PETITIONER THAT HE COULD REVIEW ALL OF THE DISCOVERY BEFORE MAKING A DECISION AS TO WHETHER TO PLEAD GUILTY. | | | | |!

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Christopher A. Canales
Christopher Andrew Canales — Petitioner
Christopher Andrew Canales — Petitioner