Whether the lower court erred in construing the patent claims at issue

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED & Rest SAIS bp A PRFESLas _ o eer VETO comer” MiSconstRUuS AS “DID tHE UND We ee Bebe Wane MR. Puma § are STEHOAS Mepier. WESp < STU aes SOFT ere “ , COME G= Hr A eben THAR conten © : 7 WED CCeshory TRE Pend PQ : wv . Q. KVEAN Ceeet TM WA: +o Cor vow WAS Ww USE mecL cure | IN MED aREAcIT? te ; te Panes ACTH AMGRDMENT a“ eo. CONST ITU ON WS TOAD Cams ge AUS nity centiwtGD ars INOTT TECH eS | WAS ete. PAWENT 5 BEUED On OVNI SOAS AN ADEQUATE BOS | SS Beet INONFTeRE Lee 7, BASIS OEE | cael 3