No. 23-6199

Trayvon Hall v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge constitutional-rights court-procedure criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-pronouncement life-sentence plain-language sentencing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a criminal defendant constitutionally entitled to have his sentence executed pursuant to the plain terms of the sentence orally pronounced in his presence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is A criminal defoadart Consfrtutionally oatiHed to have. his | β€” Sentence executed putsunrt β€œte the plain terms of the Seatace orally Pronounced in his presence ? . ; i

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Trayvon Hall
Trayvon Hall — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent