No. 23-620
Dominique Gerald Burns v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-agency administrative-law agency-authority civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-authority jurisdiction jurisdiction-challenge procedural-due-process standing state-agency
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in its ruling when it failed to protect the appellant's procedural due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS | ERRED IN ITS RULING WHEN IT FAILED TO PROTECT THE APPELLANT'S PROCEDULE DUE PROCESS. 2. WHETHER STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY HAVE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO MAKE AN ORDER AFTER JURISDICTION HAS : BEEN CHALLENGE AND NO NEGOTIATION . HAS BEEN REACH. | PARTIES TO THE CASE SOUTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL . SERVICES . DOMINIQUE GERALD BURNS OO
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services to respond filed.
2023-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2024.
2023-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2024 to February 7, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)
Attorneys
South Carolina Department of Social Services
Jasmine Denise Smith — Robinson Gray Stepp & Laffitte, LLC, Respondent
Jasmine Denise Smith — Robinson Gray Stepp & Laffitte, LLC, Respondent
Jasmine Denise Smith — Robinson Gray Stepp & Laffitte, LLC, Respondent